As always, I tend to forget to post my newspaper columns online: here is my "All In Perspective" column that ran in the Hill Country News, Georgetown Advocate, and Jarrell Star Ledger in late December/early January.
“When we dare to create conflict, we enable the very best
thinking." Margaret Heffernan
In her lecture series “Dare to Disagree,” retired CEO and author Margaret
Heffernan points out that most of us would prefer to avoid conflict. If the
status quo is not too terribly uncomfortable, we embrace what Heffernan calls
“Willful Blindness.” We blissfully ignore warning signs, and even when faced
with uncomfortable truths, we often choose ‘going along to get along.
The Willful Blindness dynamic plays a significant role in local elections.
For example, when the local guy announces his candidacy for city council, school
board, dog-catcher, etc., his friends and acquaintances are happy to endorse
him. One hears comments like, “Bob coached my son’s baseball team back in ’92-
he was great with the kids!” Or, “Dave sold me a truck last year- he was real
nice, ya know?” Unfortunately, while Bob and Dave might be really nice guys,
they might just happen to have really lousy policy ideas, but friends are
reluctant to ask the tough questions of such ‘nice guys.’
Even worse, if we point out Bob or Dave’s lousy policy ideas, local folks can
get pretty upset. Those who dare to question are often accused of being ‘too
personal’ and ‘mean-spirited.’ Never mind that nice-guy Bob thinks public
schools should do away with grades or that Dave wants the city to tax walking on
sidewalks. No one wants to create conflict with Bob and Dave, and they are often
duly elected.
Once elected, local government officials rarely conflict with each other; if
you review records of your local school board decisions, you will find that most
trustees vote in lock-step with each other. On the rare occasion when one board
member challenges the status quo, he or she is usually labeled a ‘trouble-maker’
and is likely to be run out of town on a rail.
One of the most marked examples of Willful Blindness in America is our
ostrich-approach to public education. Parents especially often become
emotionally attached to the local school, and are reluctant to even acknowledge
the existence of glaring problems. Sometimes we hear discussion of problems in
those “other” school districts, but any public education criticisms are usually
followed with, “but we live in a good district.” Sadly, the mindset is not “We
place our children in the public school because we trust the school district,”
but has become, “We trust the school district because we placed our children in
the public school.” Few parents want to know that their child has received a
sub-par education.
Unfortunately the Willful Blindness dynamic is a huge obstacle to reform in
public education. There are still many individuals who are afraid to change the
status quo (and certainly those who wield power and fortune from the status quo
don’t want change.) But these are our children, and the future of the nation
rests in their hands. Public education does not exist to provide job security
for teachers or wealth for superintendents.
We should not be afraid to ask serious questions: Why do school districts
spend so much on curriculum fads every few years? Why are only 50% of public
education employees actually teachers? Why does California have 1.6 million more
students, but Texas has 52,000 more public education employees? Why have public
education expenditures grown so much faster than enrollment rates? Why is it
okay for the district to have over $1 billion in debt? Why do education dollars
follow the district instead of the students? And so on.
Yes, our toughest questions create conflict, and folks do get upset. But the
truth matters, and Heffernan is right; engaging in conflict can allow us to do
our best thinking. Of course good questions should be asked respectfully and
without ad hominem rhetoric. We must not be afraid to question and be
questioned.
With that in mind, may your New Year be filled with productive
conflict!
No comments:
Post a Comment