Showing posts with label Leander. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leander. Show all posts

Saturday, February 23, 2013

No Labor Unions In Texas? Think Again...

Below is a column I wrote for the Georgetown Advocate, Hill Country News, and Jarrell Star Ledger  newspapers recently.  I am pleased to see that Attorney General Greg Abbott is paying attention to the problem of union growth in Texas and has proposed some new worker protections.  (H/T Push Junction.)  I sure hope more of our Texas legislators get on board.

****

Since Texas is classified as a “Right to Work” state, many people mistakenly believe that there are no labor unions in the state.  The truth is that state law only prohibits compulsory membership; unions in Texas may engage in collective bargaining and, in many cases, have the right to strike.  And while the U.S. Bureau of Labor reports that union membership declined across the nation last year, membership in Texas increased by 65,000.

Much of the Texas union growth actually occurred in the private sector, which is startling considering that private sector unions have been on the decline for several decades.  While private businesses cannot long survive under unsustainable union contracts, government entities are not necessarily responsive to economic realities; consequently most union growth has been in the public/government sector.

One possible explanation for the Texas uptick in private sector union membership stems from the increasing number of job-seekers fleeing other states.  While these Nouveau Texans come for better employment opportunities, they haven’t yet made the connection between union power and the economic decline of their home states, and they are importing union membership to Texas. 
But another reason for the uptick is that unions are targeting Texas for growth as part of a larger Democratic strategy.  Former Obama national field director and labor union activist Jeremy Bird is heading up “Battleground Texas,” which promises to incorporate local labor unions in their efforts to turn Texas ‘blue.’

At the local level, union bosses are especially targeting police, firefighters, and teachers, since these workers have a highly positive, ‘hero’ status with the general public.  It is psychologically difficult to differentiate between the local teacher and the ‘teachers’ union,’ and many voters mistakenly believe that unions are speaking for all teachers.  Another clever strategy in Texas is to completely avoid the word ‘union,’ with its negative connotations.  Most public sector unions in Texas refer to themselves as ‘associations,’ or other such benign terms.  For example, few Texans realize that “Education Round Rock” is actually a local chapter of the American Federation of Teachers union, an organization that enjoys a cozy relationship with President Obama, and has played an active role in opposing reforms in other states.

These local associations can wreak havoc with small municipalities.  In the small community of Leander, Texas, the local Professional Firefighters ‘Association’ (LPFA) is pressing for “civil service status.”  Because of loose state laws governing union power, the LPFA only needs 125 signatures to place the matter on the ballot this May.  Conversely, if voters wanted to end civil service, more than 50% of registered voters would need to approve.   Considering that local election turnout rarely tops 10%, the union’s status will be a permanent fixture. 
 
Civil Service status is highly problematic for a small community like Leander.   For starters, the city would have to pay increased benefits, create a new civil service commission, and hire a director and civil service attorney.  Even worse, the measure would effectively ban the 27 volunteer firefighters Leander now uses.  If the city hires only 1 new firefighter to replace every 3 volunteers, the annual cost to taxpayers would be $1,000,000 per year.  Leander already has the highest tax rate of any municipality in the region, and will be forced to pay even higher tax rates.  Unfortunately, as a local chapter of state and national labor unions, the LPFA will have ample manpower and financial resources for promoting the civil service measure and impacting future elections in the community.

While unions do not have to disclose all spending, the Labor Department reports unions spent at least $3.3 billion of union dues on political activity over a six-year period, and plenty of those dollars are spent to influence Texas elections.  Pro-big-labor elected officials close to President Obama are eager to dismantle Right to Work laws, and implement mandatory union membership and other unfair union policies. 
 
While we have enjoyed the benefits of our Right to Work status, we must not be complacent about union growth in Texas.  We must strengthen Right to Work protections by requiring the exact same standards for establishing or revoking civil service status for all public sector unions.  Furthermore, we need a ‘Paycheck Protection’ bill that would stop state and local governments from acting as union agents by collecting union dues from employees.  Instead of automatic deductions, union members should pay their dues directly to the union, and should be made aware of how those dues are spent. 
 
Texas is in relatively good shape, for now.  But unrestrained union power is not good news, and we need to act before it’s too late. 

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Senator Cruz Visits Leander

In case you missed it- our bold and awesome new Senator Ted Cruz was in Leander this afternoon at LaRue Tactical to discuss our 2nd Amendment rights.  Below is the press release.

Sen. Ted Cruz Leads Fight to Defend 2nd Amendment
In Wake of Efforts to Increase Gun Control
Visits LaRue Tactical Gun Manufacturer

LEANDER, TX – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) today held a press conference discussing the importance of defending the Second Amendment in the wake of calls for increased gun control at the federal level. He spoke at LaRue Tactical, a nationally-renowned gun manufacturer located outside of Austin.
“Evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that when the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves, their homes and their families are taken away, that violent crime increases and citizens are left more vulnerable to violent criminals,” said Sen. Cruz. “The Supreme Court made absolutely clear that the Second Amendment is a constitutional right of every American and constitutional rights are designed to be protected not just when they're popular, but especially when passions are high among those seeking to restrict and limit those rights. While we should use every available means to deter and to punish mass murderers, the federal government should not be trying to ban gun ownership for law-abiding Americans.”
As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Sen. Cruz has led the charge to ensure that Americans’ Second Amendment rights are not stifled by ongoing calls for increased gun control in the wake of the terrible shootings in Newtown. That tragedy was a shocking display of evil, but stricter gun control would not have prevented it, nor will keep it from happening again. It would only restrict the constitutional rights of Americans that respect and follow the law.
Evidence already shows that an assault weapons ban is ineffective, as concluded by the Department of Justice when the ban was implemented 1994-2004 and it had no impact on reducing crime. Instead of passing legislation already proven ineffective, Sen. Cruz has called for action to rather deter and punish violent criminals and to prevent those with dangerous mental illness from illegally acquiring firearms.
There is wide agreement that guns should not be in the hands of the mentally ill, and current law seeks to identify those individuals, but it relies on states submitting relevant medical records. Not all states are doing this and reports show that the federal government is not enforcing or implementing a law that is supposed to reward states for submitting mental health records and punish states that do not.
Instead of heeding calls that would trample on Americans’ Second Amendment rights, efforts must be made to enforce current law and work with states to overcome challenges that prevent them from providing more robust data. This is an area of bipartisan agreement and a direct way to address the real problem of the mentally ill getting guns.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

A Holiday For Elections



Last Saturday, while most residents were enjoying Labor Day weekend festivities, the Hutto Independent School District held a Tax Ratification Election. The district asked voters to approve a whopping $0.13 (per $100 of property valuation) tax increase. With about 1,200 votes cast, the measure passed by 67%.

Although Texas School Districts are bound by law to seek voter approval for tax rates above a certain threshold, apparently many districts would really rather not have voters scrutinize education spending too closely. In an attempt to change state laws requiring voter approval, Independent School Districts across Texas spend millions to lobby against these taxpayer protections. Nearly every district funnels lobbying funds through various advocacy groups, and some districts directly contract their own lobbyists. 

However, lest anyone think school districts do not have adequate control over property tax rates, keep in mind that the Leander ISD Board was able to raise rates this year by $1.211 without voter approval. At $1.51187, LISD has the second-highest property tax rate in the county- second only to Hutto’s $1.67 per $100.

Although ISD lobbyists have not yet succeeded in changing voter-approval laws, many school boards and administrators are employing ‘stealth election’ tactics to manipulate outcomes. Due to a loophole in state code, uniform election dates don’t apply to Tax Ratification Elections. Consequently, school districts may hold such elections nearly anytime they please, and many local ISDs have taken full advantage.

One might ask why these school districts don’t just make a valid case for the increases and hold elections on the expected dates. Well, in Hutto’s case, they did. Last November HISD asked voters to approve a much more modest increase of $0.06 per $100 of valuation, but residents rejected the measure by 57% of the vote. This year, the district doubled-down on the rate increase and scheduled the vote for Labor Day weekend. Obviously, unusual election dates make it easier to bring out ISD staff and union votes without having too many of those pesky fiscal Conservatives show up.

Other Williamson County school districts aren’t far behind, albeit with more palatable election dates. The Taylor Independent School District will also ask voters to accept a $0.13 increase on Saturday, September 8. The Georgetown ISD is requesting a much more modest increase of $0.04 per $100 of valuation, with a vote scheduled for Tuesday, October 9.

While the U.S. Constitution makes no provision for education, (a state responsibility,) Americans agree that education is a common good and are willing to support schools with their tax dollars. However, as evidenced by the fierce debates over education spending in recent years, citizens are no longer willing to write a blank check to the local public school. While some districts have been much better stewards of their resources than others, parents have noticed that a budget crunch seems to lead to fewer special education and TAG teachers, but rarely impacts the high school football program.

“Stealth” elections aren’t the only way School districts attempt to evade voter scrutiny. Many school boards liberally spend millions on pet projects they know citizens would not approve. Another Williamson County district, the Round Rock ISD, recently voted to spend leftover bond money and reserve funds to super-size one high school, and also build another $25 million facility for the 98 students enrolled in the at-risk high school. In neither case did the district hold public hearings or allow public input. At the same time, RRISD taxes are scheduled to increase by $0.045 per $100 this year- no voter approval required.

Parents and voters are noticing fundamental problems with our public school structure. Various groups have filed lawsuits to repair state funding issues and the glaring inefficiencies in school spending. Furthermore, Lt. Governor David Dewhurst has announced that he will work with Texas Senator Dan Patrick to finally sanction parental choice in education through vouchers. Hopefully, all these efforts will result in fundamental reforms to our current system. Until then, voters need to pay attention and vote.

Even if it is a holiday weekend.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Early Voting Turnout: Dismal

The Williamson County Elections office has posted the Early Voting totals through Thursday, November 3.  5,275 people have voted in Wilco, 2.2% of registered voters. 

While I would rather the un-informed just stayed home, I find it disturbing that so few of my neighbors care enough to spend about 15 minutes looking over the various ballot initiatives and take the time to vote.  It is this lack of civic knowledge and duty that has burdened taxpayers with excessive government spending and debt patterns, not just at the Federal level, but at the local level too.  Texans now owe $174.55 billion in local government debt.   

Voting is easy, and there are lots of educational resources.  You can vote today until 7pm at any open location in the county.  Your last chance will be next Tuesday, November 8.  Keep in mind that on Tuesday you will only be able to vote at your assigned precinct location.  You can look up your location online at the Williamson County Elections Office website

Texas House District 149: Meet the Candidate



Tony Dale, Republican candidate for the newly-created Texas House District 149, will hold a "Meet the Candidate" event on Tuesday, November 8, 2011, from 5:30-7:30pm, at the Crystal Falls Golf Club in Leander.  Special guests include Williamson County Commissioner Cynthia Long and Leander City Councilman Christopher Fielder.  There is no cost to attend (but I'm sure Mr. Dale would appreciate any campaign contributions).   

Dale currently serves on the Cedar Park City Council, is a decorated Army veteran,  and has a very impressive resume of Republican activism.  I cannot imagine a better candidate to represent western Williamson County. 


Thursday, September 8, 2011

Texas House District 149 Update: Updated Update

While a handful of Williamson County residents are already publicly endorsing candidates, I think this is a good time to point out that the filing period for the 2012 Primary Election is a few months away, and we still don't know which candidates will actually file to run. 

In the newly created Texas House District 149, former State Representative Corbin Van Arsdale, who recently moved to Williamson County, is the only candidate who has announced.  However, according to long-time residents of Western Williamson County, there are at least three strong candidates with deep roots in the community who may file to run for the new Texas House District 149 seat.  One of these in particular has been described as a 'game changer.'

Despite his 2008 Primary loss to Republican Allen Fletcher, Van Arsdale has indicated he would very much like to return to the State Legislature.   He has been meeting with many local leaders and trying to learn about the community.  Prior to purchasing his home in Cedar Park last April,  Van Arsdale resided in West Austin, and has remained involved in government issues as a lobbyist.  He seems capable enough, but residents are still learning about him, and many are waiting to see if one of their own will enter this race.

At this point, I would say any endorsements are premature.

Update:  The cat is out of the bag as they say:  Cedar Park City Councilman Tony Dale is announcing this Tuesday.  Details here. 

Update:  Corbin Van Arsdale sent an email to his supporters last Friday, September 16, and Monday, September 19, he announced he is withdrawing from the race.